Catlin v. Ensign

29 Pa. 264, 1857 Pa. LEXIS 152
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 3, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 29 Pa. 264 (Catlin v. Ensign) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catlin v. Ensign, 29 Pa. 264, 1857 Pa. LEXIS 152 (Pa. 1857).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered,

by Knox, J.

The First Presbyterian Church of the city of Erie [265]*265was indebted to Henry Catlin in the sum of $75 for one year’s salary as chorister, which sum was set apart by the board of trustees of the church for the payment of the debt, and was in the hands of the treasurer of the trustees.

Upon a judgment in the Common Pleas in favour of D. P. Ensign v. Henry Catlin, an execution attachment was issued against the defendant, and the money due him from the church was attached in the hands of the treasurer, against whom, as garnishee, the court below rendered judgment for the amount admitted by the answers to the interrogatories to be in his hands.

This judgment cannot be sustained. The proviso to the fifth section of the Act of the 15th April, 1845, declares “ that the wages of any labourer, or the salary of any person in public or private employment, shall not be liable.to attachment in the hands of the employer.”

This provision applies to all judgments, whether entered in the Common Pleas or on the docket of a justice of the peace; and the case in hand comes within the second member of the proviso. The money attached was for the salary due to a person in private employment, and was, therefore, not attachable.

Judgment reversed, and judgment in favour of garnishee for costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finberg v. Sullivan
634 F.2d 50 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Austin v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
59 Pa. D. & C.2d 178 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Sheryl Records, Inc. v. the Cyrkle
245 A.2d 454 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Bell v. Roberts
28 A.2d 715 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Union Trust Co. v. Altman
41 Pa. D. & C. 454 (Fayette County Court, 1941)
Wagner-Taylor Co. v. McDowell
9 A.2d 144 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Ellis Building & Loan Ass'n v. Gross
36 Pa. D. & C. 258 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
McCloskey v. Northdale Woolen Mills
145 A. 846 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
First Nat. Bank of Wilkes-Barre v. Barnum
160 F. 245 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1908)
Commonwealth v. Stambaugh
22 Pa. Super. 386 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Little v. Balliette
9 Pa. Super. 411 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Hartman v. Mitzel
8 Pa. Super. 22 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Sweeny v. Hunter
22 A. 653 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Pa. 264, 1857 Pa. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catlin-v-ensign-pa-1857.