Catlin v. Catlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Catlin v. Catlin

723 So. 2d 937, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 317, 1999 WL 18371

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1999

DocketNo. 98-2398

StatusPublished

This text of 723 So. 2d 937 (Catlin v. Catlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Catlin v. Catlin, 723 So. 2d 937, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 317, 1999 WL 18371 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Although in point one, appellant claims that the error in the valuation date of the pension is apparent on the face of the record, we disagree. The final judgment does not mention the valuation date, and appellant has pointed to no record reference to confirm what date was used. Moreover, without a transcript we cannot determine whether appellant ever raised the issue of the proper valuation date, objected at trial to the valuation used by the trial court, or presented evidence of the value of the pension on the date he alleges is the correct valuation date.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Although in point one, appellant claims that the error in the valuation date of the pension is apparent on the face of the record, we disagree. The final judgment does not mention the valuation date, and appellant has pointed to no record reference to confirm what date was used. Moreover, without a transcript we cannot determine whether appellant ever raised the issue of the proper valuation date, objected at trial to the valuation used by the trial court, or presented evidence of the value of the pension on the date he alleges is the correct valuation date.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 So. 2d 937, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 317, 1999 WL 18371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catlin-v-catlin-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack