Catlett v. State

567 So. 2d 1069, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7905, 1990 WL 154795
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1391
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 567 So. 2d 1069 (Catlett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catlett v. State, 567 So. 2d 1069, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7905, 1990 WL 154795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction for armed robbery. The prosecutor’s comments during closing argument were made in response to the theory of defense and to defense counsel’s statements during both opening and closing arguments. Error, if any occurred, was both invited and harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

However, we vacate the defendant’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989); Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987).

Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded for correction of the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catlett v. State
627 So. 2d 558 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 So. 2d 1069, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7905, 1990 WL 154795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catlett-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.