Catlett v. Chestnut

158 So. 419, 117 Fla. 538, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1300
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 6, 1934·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Whitfield, J.

It is apparent from' the whole record that, in view of- the circumstances of the asserted common law marriage and of the undisputed evidence as to the conduct and transactions of the parties thereafter, the jury in rendering the verdict and the trial judge in denying a new trial and in rendering judgment, did not believe a common law marriage had been consummated. The evidence is legally sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment and no errors affecting the result indicated are made to appear.

Affirmed.

*540 Davis, C. J., and Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur. Ellis and Buford, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Catlett v. Chestnut, 158 So. 419, 117 Fla. 538, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1300 (Fla. 1934).

158 So. 419 (Catlett v. Chestnut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Thomas
357 P.2d 935 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1960)
Small v. Shure
94 So. 2d 371 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Herring v. Eiland
81 So. 2d 645 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Rich v. Hunter
185 So. 141 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Garcia v. the Exchange Nat. Bank
167 So. 518 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)