Cathy X. Clark, Ross A. Clark and Hua Xu v. Charles Hammond, III

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 18, 2013·No. 14-12-01167-CV·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted in Part; Order filed April 18, 2013

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01167-CV

CATHY X. CLARK, ROSS A. CLARK AND HUA XU, Appellants

V.

CHARLES HAMMOND III, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-43081

ORDER

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to direct the district clerk to file legible copies of portions of the original record. The motion is granted in part. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(d) (“If the clerk’s record is defective or inaccurate, the appellate clerk must inform the trial court clerk of the defect or inaccuracy and instruct the clerk to make the correction.”)

Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, containing legible copies of Exhibits E, F, G, J and P to the affidavit of Robert S. Bennett (CR 156-172, 177-181, 191-192). In accordance with Rule 34.5(h), the clerk may consult with the parties concerning the contents of the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(h).

If more legible copies are not available, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement to that effect and the parties should avail themselves of procedures under Rule 34.5(f) or 34.2. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(f) and 34.2.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cathy X. Clark, Ross A. Clark and Hua Xu v. Charles Hammond, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Cathy X. Clark, Ross A. Clark and Hua Xu v. Charles Hammond, III (Cathy X. Clark, Ross A. Clark and Hua Xu v. Charles Hammond, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.