Cathy Diane Schniederjan v. Larry Ray Schniederjan
This text of Cathy Diane Schniederjan v. Larry Ray Schniederjan (Cathy Diane Schniederjan v. Larry Ray Schniederjan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00181-CV
CATHY DIANE SCHNIEDERJAN, APPELLANT
V.
LARRY RAY SCHNIEDERJAN, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 69th District Court Dallam County, Texas Trial Court No. 12,123, Honorable Kimberly Allen, Presiding
August 19, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Cathy Diane Schniederjan, appeals from the trial court’s judgment. Now
pending before this Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion seeking voluntary dismissal
of the appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of
Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party
from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court
has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the
motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the payment of costs, costs will be taxed against Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for
rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cathy Diane Schniederjan v. Larry Ray Schniederjan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cathy-diane-schniederjan-v-larry-ray-schniederjan-texapp-2024.