Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America, Inc. v. Nacino
This text of Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America, Inc. v. Nacino (Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America, Inc. v. Nacino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0001296 18-MAR-2015 11:57 AM
SCPW-14-0001296
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
CATHOLIC FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC.,
aka MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE EDWIN C. NACINO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent Judge,
and
JOHN ROE 2; SOCIETY OF THE PRIESTS OF SAINT SULPICE
a/k/a THE ASSOCIATED SULPICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES, INC.; and
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE STATE OF HAWAII, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CIV. NO. 12-1-1637-06)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner Catholic Foreign
Mission Society of America, Inc., aka Maryknoll Fathers and
Brothers’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on November
12, 2014, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support
thereof, and the record, it appears that Petitioner fails to
demonstrate that, under the specific facts and circumstances of
this matter and the terms of the protective order, disclosure of
the requested documents pursuant to the protective order issued
by the Discovery Master violates article I, section 6 of the
Hawai'i Constitution. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to
a writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204-05,
982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is meant to
restrain a judge of an inferior court who has exceeded his or her
jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of
discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before
the court under circumstances in which he or she has a legal duty
to act). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2015.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America, Inc. v. Nacino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catholic-foreign-mission-society-of-america-inc-v--haw-2015.