Catholic Bishop of N. Alaska v. Unaatuq, LLC

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 26 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CATHOLIC BISHOP OF No. 15-35197 NORTHERN ALASKA, D.C. No. 4:14-cv-00010-HRH Debtor, District of Alaska, ______________________________ Fairbanks

DEWEY GREEN; MARY READER, ORDER AMENDING

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNAATUQ, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

In re: CATHOLIC BISHOP OF No. 15-35205 NORTHERN ALASKA, D.C. No. 4:14-cv-00012-HRH Debtor, ______________________________

LOUIE GREEN, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

UNAATUQ, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

Before: FISHER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

The memorandum disposition filed on August 17, 2016 is amended on page

three line six by adding new footnote one, which states:

Claimants’ argument that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over them fails. Claimants filed a Rule 60(b)(4) motion in the bankruptcy court seeking relief from the prior sale order, arguing that they had acquired title to a portion of the Property through adverse possession. See Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 135 S. Ct. 1932, 1939 (2015) (stating there is no jurisdictional defect “when the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy judge”).

With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing shall be filed.