Catherine Torres v. William Barr

946 F.3d 1040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Catherine Torres v. William Barr. Read the opinion of the Court — 976 F.3d 918
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 13, 2020·No. 13-70653·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 13 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CATHERINE LOPENA TORRES, No. 13-70653

Petitioner, Agency No. A087-957-047

v. ORDER WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Catherine Torres v. William Barr, 946 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2020).

946 F.3d 1040 (Catherine Torres v. William Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.