Catherine Kesterson v. Walter Jarrett
This text of Catherine Kesterson v. Walter Jarrett (Catherine Kesterson v. Walter Jarrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DIVISION ELLINGTON, C. J., DOYLE, P. J., and ANDREWS, J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
August 16, 2012
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A10A1452. KESTERSON et al. v. JARRETT et al.
E LLINGTON, Chief Judge.
The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our decision in Division 1 of our
opinion in this case, holding that Kyla Kesterson was improperly excluded from the
courtroom during almost all of her trial, and that such constituted reversible error
demanding a new trial. Kesterson v. Jarrett, ___ Ga. ___ (___ SE2d ___), 2012 Ga.
LEXIS 567, (Case No. S11G0590, decided June 18, 2012). Accordingly, our ruling
as to that Division is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the
judgment of this Court.
Judgment reversed and remanded. Doyle, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Catherine Kesterson v. Walter Jarrett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catherine-kesterson-v-walter-jarrett-gactapp-2012.