Catherine Gandy v. John Gandy, Jr.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Catherine Crosby Gandy, Respondent,
v.
John Wilson Gandy, Jr., Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2024-000611
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Horry County
The Honorable FitzLee McEachin, Family Court Judge
Opinion No. 28239
Submitted September 25, 2024 – Filed November 6, 2024
REMANDED
Carolyn R. Hills and Jennifer Darrow Hills, both of Hills & Hills, PC, of Myrtle Beach; and Rebecca Brown West, of Harling & West, LLC, of Lexington, all for Appellant.
George M. Hearn, Jr. and Kathleen Wrenn Hearn, both of Hearn & Hearn, PA, of Conway; and Marie-Louise Ramsdale, of Ramsdale Law Firm, of Mount Pleasant, all for Respondent.
Russell W. Hall, III, of The Law Office of Russell W. Hall III, of Myrtle Beach, as the Guardian ad Litem for
Appellant.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision reversing the family court's order awarding rehabilitative alimony or to recalculate the child support payments in the absence of alimony. Gandy v. Gandy, 442 S.C. 340, 898 S.E.2d 208 (2024). We hereby grant the petition to review the child support calculation.
In its final order, the family court considered the alimony awarded to Wife when calculating the child support payment. Because the court of appeals properly reversed the alimony award, the child support payments must be recalculated.
Accordingly, we dispense with briefing, affirm the court of appeals' opinion, and remand this matter to the family court for a trial de novo to recalculate child support.
REMANDED.
KITTREDGE, C.J., FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur. VERDIN, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Catherine Gandy v. John Gandy, Jr. (Catherine Gandy v. John Gandy, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.