Catherine G. v. Dowling

211 A.D.2d 581, 622 N.Y.S.2d 16

This text of 211 A.D.2d 581 (Catherine G. v. Dowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catherine G. v. Dowling, 211 A.D.2d 581, 622 N.Y.S.2d 16 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

[582]*582Determination of respondent Michael Dowling, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated November 23, 1993, which upheld the decision of respondent Barbara J. Sabol, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, which upheld the decision of respondent Harlem Dowling-Westside Center for Children and Family Services, to remove three foster children from petitioner’s home, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Walter B. Tolub, J.], entered May 27, 1994) is dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of the Administrative Law Judge, who was in the best position to determine the credibility of the witnesses, that the child care agency, Harlem Dowling-Westside Center for Children and Family Services, did not abuse its discretion by removing the three foster children from petitioner’s home after the eldest child, at the age of six, was found to have contracted a sexually transmitted disease while in petitioner’s care and all of the children demonstrated that they had been exposed to inappropriate sexual contact while in petitioner’s care, especially where the named abuser was the petitioner’s teenage grandson (who still resides nearby) and where the petitioner has demonstrated an inability both to accept that the abuse occurred and to comprehend the significance thereof. Under the circumstances present here, the Agency’s decision to remove the children from petitioner’s care was reasonably based (Social Services Law §§ 383, 400; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179, quoting Matter of Stork Rest. v Boland, 282 NY 256, 273). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. Boland
26 N.E.2d 247 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.D.2d 581, 622 N.Y.S.2d 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catherine-g-v-dowling-nyappdiv-1995.