STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
16-990
CATHERINE COBB
VERSUS
LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD
**********
APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - # 4 PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 0103123 SHARON MORROW, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION JUDGE
D. KENT SAVOIE JUDGE
Court composed of D. Kent Savoie, Van H. Kyzar, and David E. Chatelain 1 , Judges.
Chatelain, J., concurs in the result and assigns reasons.
REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART AS AMENDED.
1 Honorable David E. Chatelain participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore. Michael B. Miller Attorney at Law P. O. Drawer 1630 Crowley, LA 70527-1630 (337) 785-9500 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE: Catherine Cobb
L. Lane Roy Brown Sims 600 Jefferson St., Suite 800 Lafayette, LA 70501 (337) 484-1240 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Lafayette Parish School Board
Catherine M. Landry Mandy Simon Preis PLC 102 Versailles Boulevard, Suite 400 P. O. Drawer 94-C Lafayette, LA 70509 (337) 237-6062 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Lafayette Parish School Board SAVOIE, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation matter, the employer appeals an award of
penalties and attorney fees in favor of the claimant for failing to pay claimant’s
medical bills. For the reasons that follow, we reverse in part, and affirm in part as
amended.
Procedural and Factual Background
On May 8, 2001, Catherine Cobb filed a disputed claim for compensation
alleging she was injured in September 2000, during the course and scope of her
employment with the Lafayette Parish School Board (LPSB). On July 20, 2005,
the parties stipulated that Ms. Cobb was entitled to temporary total disability
benefits. LPSB then terminated these benefits on August 30, 2006. However, it
did not file a motion seeking to modify Ms. Cobb’s benefits until May 30, 2008.
On August 31, 2009, the Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC) rendered
judgment in favor of Ms. Cobb, awarding indemnity benefits in the amount of
$195.25 payable from September 12, 2000 through May 30, 2008, as well as
$3,000.00 in penalties, which was 24% of unpaid benefits from August 31, 2006
through May 30, 2008. Ms. Cobb was also awarded $10,000.00 in attorney fees,
$1,135.53 in costs, and legal interest. No other benefits were awarded.
Ms. Cobb appealed the August 31, 2009 judgment to the extent it failed to
award her with any other benefits, and LPSB appealed the award of penalties and
attorney fees. The August 31, 2009 judgment was affirmed in all respects by this
court on November 3, 2010. Cobb v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 10-430 (La.App.
3 Cir. 11/3/10), 49 So.3d 597, writ denied, 10-2692 (La. 1/28/11), 56 So.3d 958.
On July 7, 2010, Ms. Cobb filed a motion seeking additional penalties and
attorney fees for LPSB’s failure to pay the August 31, 2009 judgment. The workers’ compensation judge granted Ms. Cobb’s motion and awarded her $3,000
in penalties and $2,500 in attorney fees pursuant to a judgment dated March 27,
2012.
Ms. Cobb filed another motion seeking penalties and attorney fees on
October 12, 2012, alleging LPSB failed to pay the March 27, 2012 judgment. She
then filed an amended motion on December 14, 2012, additionally alleging that
LPSB failed to pay certain medical bills incurred by Ms. Cobb, and therefore, that
she was entitled to penalties and attorney fees. Ms. Cobb did not seek payment of
those bills from LPSB.
The bills at issue include $4,999 for services rendered by Michael Berard,
Ph.D. from October 17, 2005, through February 14, 2008; $4,730 for services
rendered by Michael Berard, Ph.D. from March 2008 through August 2010; three
separate bills totaling $80 each for services rendered by Dr. Pervez Mussarat on
December 1, 2009, February 24, 2010, and June 15, 2010; and receipts for
medication prescribed by Dr. Mussarat that Ms. Cobb purchased from CVS
pharmacy from January 2010 through July 2010.
A hearing was held on June 28, 2013. On April 23, 2015, the OWC
rendered judgment granting Ms. Cobb’s motions and awarding her $3,000 in
penalties in accordance with La.R.S. 23:1201(G) for LPSB’s failure to pay the
2012 judgment, $6,000 in penalties in accordance with La.R.S. 23:1201(F) for
LPSB’s failure to pay medical bills, $5,000 in attorney fees, together with costs
and legal interest.
LPSB filed a motion for new trial on May 4, 2015, asserting for the first time
that Ms. Cobb’s claims for penalties and attorney fees with respect to the unpaid
medical bills were barred by res judicata, given the finality of the August 31, 2009
2 judgment. A hearing was held on June 9, 2015. Judgment was rendered on June 8,
2016, denying LPSB’s motion. LPSB has appealed. In addition, Ms. Cobb has
submitted a motion to this court to remove evidence from the record before us.
Ms. Cobb’s Motion to Remove Evidence
Ms. Cobb seeks to remove from the record documentation attached as
Exhibits 1 and 2 to LPSB’s post-hearing memorandum in support of its motion for
new trial, arguing that no evidence was offered or accepted during the hearing on
LPSB’s motion. Specifically, LPSB attached as Exhibit 1 the OWC’s August 31,
2009 judgment and reasons for judgment, and it attached as Exhibit 2 an unsigned
copy of Ms. Cobb’s appellant brief to this court in connection with her appeal of
the August 2009 judgment.
“Evidence not properly and officially offered and introduced cannot be
considered, even if it is physically placed in the record. Documents attached to
memoranda do not constitute evidence and cannot be considered as such on
appeal.” Denoux v. Vessel Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 07-2143, p. 6 (La. 5/21/08), 983
So.2d 84, 88. Therefore, we do not consider the content of Exhibit 2 on appeal,
and Ms. Cobb’s motion is granted in that regard. However, we note that Exhibit 1
was merely a copy of the workers’ compensation judge’s prior judgment and
written reasons rendered in connection with the instant matter, and therefore, it is
already in the workers’ compensation court’s record. Thus, we deny Ms. Cobb’s
motion as to Exhibit 1.
LPSB’s Appeal
On appeal, LPSB contends that the workers’ compensation judge erred in
awarding penalties and attorney fees for its failure to pay Ms. Cobb’s medical bills
at issue. It argues that Ms. Cobb failed to present sufficient evidence, that concepts
3 of res judicata and the law of case doctrine barred Ms. Cobb’s claims, and that it
was justified in not paying the bills at issue. In addition, LPSB asserts that the trial
court erred in not granting its motion for new trial. LPSB does not appeal the
award of penalties and attorney fees in connection with its failure to pay the prior
judgment; therefore, we do not address the propriety of that portion of the
judgment.
“The determination of whether an employer should be cast with penalties
and attorney fees is a question of fact which should not be reversed absent manifest
error.” Sigler v. Rand, 04-1138, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/29/04), 896 So.2d
189, 196, writ denied, 05-278 (La. 4/1/05), 897 So.2d 611.
Ms. Cobb’s claim for penalties and attorney fees related to LPSB’s failure to
pay the medical bills at issue is necessarily dependent upon a finding that Ms.
Cobb was entitled to payment of medical benefits resulting from the September
2000 accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
16-990
CATHERINE COBB
VERSUS
LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD
**********
APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - # 4 PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 0103123 SHARON MORROW, WORKERS’ COMPENSATION JUDGE
D. KENT SAVOIE JUDGE
Court composed of D. Kent Savoie, Van H. Kyzar, and David E. Chatelain 1 , Judges.
Chatelain, J., concurs in the result and assigns reasons.
REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART AS AMENDED.
1 Honorable David E. Chatelain participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore. Michael B. Miller Attorney at Law P. O. Drawer 1630 Crowley, LA 70527-1630 (337) 785-9500 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE: Catherine Cobb
L. Lane Roy Brown Sims 600 Jefferson St., Suite 800 Lafayette, LA 70501 (337) 484-1240 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Lafayette Parish School Board
Catherine M. Landry Mandy Simon Preis PLC 102 Versailles Boulevard, Suite 400 P. O. Drawer 94-C Lafayette, LA 70509 (337) 237-6062 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Lafayette Parish School Board SAVOIE, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation matter, the employer appeals an award of
penalties and attorney fees in favor of the claimant for failing to pay claimant’s
medical bills. For the reasons that follow, we reverse in part, and affirm in part as
amended.
Procedural and Factual Background
On May 8, 2001, Catherine Cobb filed a disputed claim for compensation
alleging she was injured in September 2000, during the course and scope of her
employment with the Lafayette Parish School Board (LPSB). On July 20, 2005,
the parties stipulated that Ms. Cobb was entitled to temporary total disability
benefits. LPSB then terminated these benefits on August 30, 2006. However, it
did not file a motion seeking to modify Ms. Cobb’s benefits until May 30, 2008.
On August 31, 2009, the Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC) rendered
judgment in favor of Ms. Cobb, awarding indemnity benefits in the amount of
$195.25 payable from September 12, 2000 through May 30, 2008, as well as
$3,000.00 in penalties, which was 24% of unpaid benefits from August 31, 2006
through May 30, 2008. Ms. Cobb was also awarded $10,000.00 in attorney fees,
$1,135.53 in costs, and legal interest. No other benefits were awarded.
Ms. Cobb appealed the August 31, 2009 judgment to the extent it failed to
award her with any other benefits, and LPSB appealed the award of penalties and
attorney fees. The August 31, 2009 judgment was affirmed in all respects by this
court on November 3, 2010. Cobb v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 10-430 (La.App.
3 Cir. 11/3/10), 49 So.3d 597, writ denied, 10-2692 (La. 1/28/11), 56 So.3d 958.
On July 7, 2010, Ms. Cobb filed a motion seeking additional penalties and
attorney fees for LPSB’s failure to pay the August 31, 2009 judgment. The workers’ compensation judge granted Ms. Cobb’s motion and awarded her $3,000
in penalties and $2,500 in attorney fees pursuant to a judgment dated March 27,
2012.
Ms. Cobb filed another motion seeking penalties and attorney fees on
October 12, 2012, alleging LPSB failed to pay the March 27, 2012 judgment. She
then filed an amended motion on December 14, 2012, additionally alleging that
LPSB failed to pay certain medical bills incurred by Ms. Cobb, and therefore, that
she was entitled to penalties and attorney fees. Ms. Cobb did not seek payment of
those bills from LPSB.
The bills at issue include $4,999 for services rendered by Michael Berard,
Ph.D. from October 17, 2005, through February 14, 2008; $4,730 for services
rendered by Michael Berard, Ph.D. from March 2008 through August 2010; three
separate bills totaling $80 each for services rendered by Dr. Pervez Mussarat on
December 1, 2009, February 24, 2010, and June 15, 2010; and receipts for
medication prescribed by Dr. Mussarat that Ms. Cobb purchased from CVS
pharmacy from January 2010 through July 2010.
A hearing was held on June 28, 2013. On April 23, 2015, the OWC
rendered judgment granting Ms. Cobb’s motions and awarding her $3,000 in
penalties in accordance with La.R.S. 23:1201(G) for LPSB’s failure to pay the
2012 judgment, $6,000 in penalties in accordance with La.R.S. 23:1201(F) for
LPSB’s failure to pay medical bills, $5,000 in attorney fees, together with costs
and legal interest.
LPSB filed a motion for new trial on May 4, 2015, asserting for the first time
that Ms. Cobb’s claims for penalties and attorney fees with respect to the unpaid
medical bills were barred by res judicata, given the finality of the August 31, 2009
2 judgment. A hearing was held on June 9, 2015. Judgment was rendered on June 8,
2016, denying LPSB’s motion. LPSB has appealed. In addition, Ms. Cobb has
submitted a motion to this court to remove evidence from the record before us.
Ms. Cobb’s Motion to Remove Evidence
Ms. Cobb seeks to remove from the record documentation attached as
Exhibits 1 and 2 to LPSB’s post-hearing memorandum in support of its motion for
new trial, arguing that no evidence was offered or accepted during the hearing on
LPSB’s motion. Specifically, LPSB attached as Exhibit 1 the OWC’s August 31,
2009 judgment and reasons for judgment, and it attached as Exhibit 2 an unsigned
copy of Ms. Cobb’s appellant brief to this court in connection with her appeal of
the August 2009 judgment.
“Evidence not properly and officially offered and introduced cannot be
considered, even if it is physically placed in the record. Documents attached to
memoranda do not constitute evidence and cannot be considered as such on
appeal.” Denoux v. Vessel Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 07-2143, p. 6 (La. 5/21/08), 983
So.2d 84, 88. Therefore, we do not consider the content of Exhibit 2 on appeal,
and Ms. Cobb’s motion is granted in that regard. However, we note that Exhibit 1
was merely a copy of the workers’ compensation judge’s prior judgment and
written reasons rendered in connection with the instant matter, and therefore, it is
already in the workers’ compensation court’s record. Thus, we deny Ms. Cobb’s
motion as to Exhibit 1.
LPSB’s Appeal
On appeal, LPSB contends that the workers’ compensation judge erred in
awarding penalties and attorney fees for its failure to pay Ms. Cobb’s medical bills
at issue. It argues that Ms. Cobb failed to present sufficient evidence, that concepts
3 of res judicata and the law of case doctrine barred Ms. Cobb’s claims, and that it
was justified in not paying the bills at issue. In addition, LPSB asserts that the trial
court erred in not granting its motion for new trial. LPSB does not appeal the
award of penalties and attorney fees in connection with its failure to pay the prior
judgment; therefore, we do not address the propriety of that portion of the
judgment.
“The determination of whether an employer should be cast with penalties
and attorney fees is a question of fact which should not be reversed absent manifest
error.” Sigler v. Rand, 04-1138, pp. 10-11 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/29/04), 896 So.2d
189, 196, writ denied, 05-278 (La. 4/1/05), 897 So.2d 611.
Ms. Cobb’s claim for penalties and attorney fees related to LPSB’s failure to
pay the medical bills at issue is necessarily dependent upon a finding that Ms.
Cobb was entitled to payment of medical benefits resulting from the September
2000 accident.
In order to establish a claim for medical benefits, a claimant must show that the benefit is occasioned by the work-related accident to a reasonable certainty and by a preponderance of the evidence. Additionally, a claimant must prove, also by a preponderance of the evidence, that a particular medical expense is necessary.
Alleman v. Fruit of the Loom-Crowley, 96-1246, pp. 5-6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/5/97),
692 So.2d 485, 488 (citations omitted).
At trial, invoices from Dr. Berard and Dr. Mussarat, showing only the dates
of services rendered and the costs of services, were submitted into evidence.
Receipts from CVS pharmacy showing medication purchased by Ms. Cobb and the
costs of those purchases were also submitted into evidence. In addition, Ms. Cobb
testified that she was treated by Dr. Berard and Dr. Mussarat on the dates
appearing on the invoices, and that Dr. Mussarat, who prescribed her the
4 medication obtained from CVS pharmacy, was a neurologist. There was no
evidence whatsoever establishing the nature of the treatment received by Ms. Cobb,
that the treatment or prescriptions were necessitated by any injuries Ms. Cobb
allegedly sustained in the September 2000 accident, or that the particular medical
expenses were necessary. The fact that she may have incurred these bills is
insufficient to establish her entitlement to benefits, without showing some
connection between the bills and services received with the injuries related to the
workers’ compensation claim. Therefore, the OWC was manifestly erroneous in
concluding that Ms. Cobb was entitled to penalties and attorney fees due to
LPSB’s failure to pay the medical bills at issue. We reverse the award of $6,000 in
penalties for failure to pay the medical bills at issue, and the attorney fees awarded
in this matter are reduced to $2,500 so as to eliminate attorney fees incurred in
connection with Ms. Cobb’s claims concerning the medical bills at issue.
Because we find that the evidence was insufficient to award penalties and
attorney fees for LPSB’s failure to pay the medical bills at issue, we pretermit the
issues of whether Ms. Cobb’s claims were barred by res judicata, and whether the
workers’ compensation judge’s denial of LPSB’s motion for new trial asserting res
judicata was an abuse of discretion.
CONCLUSION
We grant in part Ms. Cobb’s Motion to Remove Evidence with respect to
Exhibit 2 attached to LPSB’s memorandum in support of its motion for new trial.
Otherwise, Ms. Cobb’s motion is denied.
We further reverse the award of $6,000 in penalties for failing to pay the
medical bills at issue, and reduce the attorney fee award to $2,500. Costs of this
appeal are assessed to Appellee, Catherine Cobb.
5 REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART AS AMENDED.