Cathcart v. Cannon

1 Johns. Cas. 28
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1799·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appears that the "defendant made a bona fide attempt to surrender the principal, before the return of the capias, which was frustrated. The principal was afterwards imprisoned for life, and had the surrender been completed, it could not have benefited the plaintiff. The rule must be made absolute, on payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cathcart v. Cannon, 1 Johns. Cas. 28 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

1 Johns. Cas. 28 (Cathcart v. Cannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Way v. Wright
46 Mass. 380 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1843)
Bigelow v. Johnson
16 Mass. 218 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)
Sayward v. Conant
11 Mass. 146 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1814)