Cathay Crafts Corp. v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 211, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 936
United States Customs Court·Decided June 24, 1953·No. No. 57409; protests 154543-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of charcoal irons, smoothing irons, trays, receptacles, etc., the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423) and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), the items marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass or copper, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and the items marked with the letter “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753), as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of pewter, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver. The items [212]*212marked with the letter “C,” stipulated to consist of silent butlers the same as those involved in The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cathay Crafts Corp. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 211, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 936 (cusc 1953).

31 Cust. Ct. 211 (Cathay Crafts Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 342 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
Fan Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 42 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 280 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)