Cates v. Parker

Michigan Superior Court, Detroit

Cates v. Parker

1 How. N.P. 2

DecidedJuly 1, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 2 (Cates v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Superior Court, Detroit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cates v. Parker, 1 How. N.P. 2 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

Chirm an J.,

overruled the demurrer on this ground, and this was the only point in the case.

On the trial the plaintiff and defendant offered their resjDective proofs. Not a single exception was taken during the trial, and the only request to charge was that the plaintiff had made out no case, on the ground above referred to. This request was refused. The whole point in the case was therefore as described.

Yerdict for the plaintiff for $2,500.

Defendant afterward paid plaintiff $2,000 and costs rather than take his chance of reversing the judgment in the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

Chirm an J.,

overruled the demurrer on this ground, and this was the only point in the case.

On the trial the plaintiff and defendant offered their resjDective proofs. Not a single exception was taken during the trial, and the only request to charge was that the plaintiff had made out no case, on the ground above referred to. This request was refused. The whole point in the case was therefore as described.

Yerdict for the plaintiff for $2,500.

Defendant afterward paid plaintiff $2,000 and costs rather than take his chance of reversing the judgment in the Supreme Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. N.P. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cates-v-parker-michsuperctdetr-1882.