Cates v. Nichols

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cates v. Nichols

252 S.E.2d 2, 148 Ga. App. 558, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3213

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 28, 1978

Docket56492

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 252 S.E.2d 2 (Cates v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cates v. Nichols, 252 S.E.2d 2, 148 Ga. App. 558, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3213 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

Appellants brought an action against appellees, a television reporter and his employer, alleging that they were defamed by a news broadcast in which it was reported that "Shag” Cates, Fulton County tax assessor, had not divested himself of his real estate holdings and that "Shag” Cates held certain property jointly with close relatives, the appellants. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, holding that the broadcast was, as a matter of law, not defamatory. We agree.

Submitted September 19,1978 Decided November 28, 1978 Rehearing denied December 20, 1978 J. Ralph McClelland, Jr., J. Ralph McClelland, III, for appellants. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Frank Love, Jr., James C. Rawls, for appellees.

The broadcast to which appellants object, when considered as a whole, is unambiguous. It amounts to no more than a statement that "Shag” Cates, by continuing in the real estate business and by being involved in joint ownership of land with his relatives has permitted the appearance of impropriety. In the text of the broadcast is a specific disclaimer of any suggestion of actual impropriety. No conduct which may be termed illegal, dishonest or immoral is imputed to appellants. Since the broadcast is, as a matter of law, not defamatory, the trial court was correct in granting the motion to dismiss. See Coats v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 132 Ga. App. 159 (207 SE2d 657).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shulman, Judge.

Appellants brought an action against appellees, a television reporter and his employer, alleging that they were defamed by a news broadcast in which it was reported that "Shag” Cates, Fulton County tax assessor, had not divested himself of his real estate holdings and that "Shag” Cates held certain property jointly with close relatives, the appellants. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, holding that the broadcast was, as a matter of law, not defamatory. We agree.

Submitted September 19,1978 Decided November 28, 1978 Rehearing denied December 20, 1978 J. Ralph McClelland, Jr., J. Ralph McClelland, III, for appellants. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Frank Love, Jr., James C. Rawls, for appellees.

The broadcast to which appellants object, when considered as a whole, is unambiguous. It amounts to no more than a statement that "Shag” Cates, by continuing in the real estate business and by being involved in joint ownership of land with his relatives has permitted the appearance of impropriety. In the text of the broadcast is a specific disclaimer of any suggestion of actual impropriety. No conduct which may be termed illegal, dishonest or immoral is imputed to appellants. Since the broadcast is, as a matter of law, not defamatory, the trial court was correct in granting the motion to dismiss. See Coats v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 132 Ga. App. 159 (207 SE2d 657).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 S.E.2d 2, 148 Ga. App. 558, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 3213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cates-v-nichols-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack