Cates v. Eggers
This text of 187 So. 2d 672 (Cates v. Eggers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Amended Complaint seeks an accounting of the profits of a partnership in which the plaintiff’s testator was once a member. The defendants, after filing an Answer and taking depositions, moved for summary judgment, which was granted by the trial Judge because there was no genuine issue as to the material facts on which the cause of action was based. The Court could not and should not have arrived at any other conclusion. Such being the case, the claimed technical invalidity of his earlier rulings is of no consequence.
The summary final decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 So. 2d 672, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cates-v-eggers-fladistctapp-1966.