Cates v. Cates

170 S.E.2d 416, 225 Ga. 612, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 587
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 29, 1969·No. 25427·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

Enumerated as error is a ruling that the appellee wife had met the six months’ residence requirement of Code Ann. § 30-107 for filing suit for divorce, and also an order awarding temporary alimony. These enumerations arose out of an action filed in the Superior Court of Murray County by Nancy Geneva Cates against Clarence Randolph Cates, Jr.

The first of these issues, which was certified for immediate review, involves a question of fact. While there was evidence in support of the husband’s contention that the wife had not resided in Murray County for the six months before she filed her suit, there was ample evidence to sustain the trial court’s ruling, upon motion to dismiss, that she had fulfilled this requirement. She swore categorically that she had lived in a specified portion of Murray County for about six years, had never moved to any other place, and had never intended to reside in another state. Therefore, this enumeration is without merit.

The second enumeration cannot be considered. This is because the ruling that it complains of, an order granting temporary alimony, was entered on July 11, 1969, which was subsequent to filing of the notice of appeal on July 9, 1969. See Graham v. Haley, 224 Ga. 498, 501 (162 SE2d 346).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cates v. Cates, 170 S.E.2d 416, 225 Ga. 612, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 587 (Ga. 1969).

170 S.E.2d 416 (Cates v. Cates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nancy Michelle Murphy v. John Harold Murphy
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
Murphy v. Murphy
759 S.E.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Angel Cancel v. Alvin Sewell
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Cancel v. Sewell
740 S.E.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Waters v. Chase Manhattan Bank
709 S.E.2d 37 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Bloomfield v. Bloomfield
646 S.E.2d 207 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
Watkins v. Watkins
466 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Hester v. Human
439 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Costanzo v. Jones
409 S.E.2d 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Scott v. Scott
211 S.E.2d 738 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)