Cates v. Cates

Supreme Court of Alabama

Cates v. Cates

89 So. 2d 69, 264 Ala. 628, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 424

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 26, 1956

Docket7 Div. 288

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 So. 2d 69 (Cates v. Cates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cates v. Cates, 89 So. 2d 69, 264 Ala. 628, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 424 (Ala. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

SIMPSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s petition filed in the circuit court in equity to sell certain personal property of his intestate.

The assignments of error challenging the ruling on the demurrer are not argued and are, therefore, waived. 2A Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, <3=1078(1).

Appellant also assigns as error the overruling of her plea in abatement to the petition. Such an assignment is not subject to review on this appeal. Marion County v. Middleton, 246 Ala. 464, 21 So.2d 312.

It results, therefore, that the decree appealed from must be affirmed. So ordered.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and SPANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI