Cates v. Cates

89 So. 2d 69, 264 Ala. 628, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 424
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 26, 1956·No. 7 Div. 288·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SIMPSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s petition filed in the circuit court in equity to sell certain personal property of his intestate.

The assignments of error challenging the ruling on the demurrer are not argued and are, therefore, waived. 2A Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, <3=1078(1).

Appellant also assigns as error the overruling of her plea in abatement to the petition. Such an assignment is not subject to review on this appeal. Marion County v. Middleton, 246 Ala. 464, 21 So.2d 312.

It results, therefore, that the decree appealed from must be affirmed. So ordered.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and SPANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cates v. Cates, 89 So. 2d 69, 264 Ala. 628, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 424 (Ala. 1956).

89 So. 2d 69 (Cates v. Cates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Central Park Little Boys League
119 So. 2d 23 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Cates v. Cates
104 So. 2d 756 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)