Cater v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Cater v. Cleveland

683 N.E.2d 791, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1488

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 3, 1997

Docket97-1488

StatusPublished

This text of 683 N.E.2d 791 (Cater v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cater v. Cleveland, 683 N.E.2d 791, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1488 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga Appl No. 70674. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed July 7, 1997:

“The conflict in question is whether a governmental function and the absolute immunity provided it under R.C. 2744.01(C)(2)(u) is still subject to the exceptions to immunity provided in R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) and (4). The decisions in conflict with the opinion sub judice include Hall v. Bd. of Edn. (4th App. Dist 1996), 111 Ohio App.3d 690 [676 N.E.2d 1241], and Siebenaler v. Village of Montpelier (July 26, 1996), Williams App. No. WM-95-035, unreported [1996 WL 420873.]”

[1489]*1489Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Cook, J., not participating.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 97-1261, infra.

Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI