Cater v. Campbell
This text of 51 S.E.2d 584 (Cater v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a dispossessory-warrant proceeding no amount is involved within the meaning of the provisions of the act of March 10, 1933 (Ga. L. 1933, p. 290 et seq.), as amended so as to authorize a direct bill of exceptions to the Court of Appeals to review a judgment of the trial judge of the Civil Court of Fulton County granting a motion for a new trial. This court is without jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error and it must be dismissed. Healey Real Estate & Improvement Co. v. Wilson, 74 Ga. App. 63 (38 S. E. 2d, 747), and cases cited. This court has already disposed of the case of Faust v. Beale, 58 Ga. App. 358 (198 S. E. ,313), insofar as any ruling contrary to what is here ruled is concerned, in Franzen v. Wall, 74 Ga. App. 823 (41 S. E. 2d, 430). See also cases cited therein.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 S.E.2d 584, 78 Ga. App. 594, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cater-v-campbell-gactapp-1949.