Cater v. Ayers

111 S.E. 443, 28 Ga. App. 364, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 519
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 9, 1922
Docket12834
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 443 (Cater v. Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cater v. Ayers, 111 S.E. 443, 28 Ga. App. 364, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This suit was for certain money and the value of a bank certificate of deposit which the plaintiff alleged the defendants converted to their own use. Under the evidence introduced by the plaintiff the court did not err in granting a nonsuit as to Mrs. Ayers, one of the defendants. Under all of the evidence adduced upon the trial, the verdict against the remaining defendant for $80 principal and $14.76 interest was authorized.

The alleged newly discovered evidence is impeaching and cumulative, and would not likely produce a different result upon another trial.

No ground of the motion for a new trial approved by the trial judge shows reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 443, 28 Ga. App. 364, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cater-v-ayers-gactapp-1922.