Cate v. Little

1 Thompson 63, 1 Shan. Cas. 39
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

McKinney, J.:

This was an action brought before a justice of the peace by a widow upon a debt due to her husband, and assigned to her by commissioners appointed by the county court to lay off a years support. The assignment vested the widow with a legal right to sue, and suit was properly brought by her in her own name. The assignment to the widow cannot be questioned by the debtor. The county courtis upon this subject a court of exclusive jurisdiction, and its action will be presumed to be correct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cate v. Little, 1 Thompson 63, 1 Shan. Cas. 39 (Tenn. 1850).

1 Thompson 63 (Cate v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. Hennigan
379 F. Supp. 410 (D. Massachusetts, 1974)
Economu v. Bates
222 F. Supp. 988 (S.D. New York, 1963)
Holzworth v. Roth
101 N.W.2d 393 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1960)
Enoch C. Richards Co. v. Libby
33 A.2d 537 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1943)
Taylor v. Morgan & Co.
78 A. 377 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1910)
Grant v. Spear
74 A. 1130 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1909)
Pickering v. Cassidy
44 A. 683 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1899)
Hunter v. Carroll
29 A. 639 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1892)
Golden v. Blaskopf
126 Mass. 523 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)