Cate v. Little
This text of 1 Thompson 63 (Cate v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action brought before a justice of the peace by a widow upon a debt due to her husband, and assigned to her by commissioners appointed by the county court to lay off a years support. The assignment vested the widow with a legal right to sue, and suit was properly brought by her in her own name. The assignment to the widow cannot be questioned by the debtor. The county courtis upon this subject a court of exclusive jurisdiction, and its action will be presumed to be correct.
As to the presumption in favor of the jurisdiction of the County Court, see Brien v. Hart, 6 Humph. 131; Campbell v. McIrwin & Lusk, 4 Hayw. 60; Gwin v. Vanzant, 7 Yerg. 143; King v. Vaughn, 8 Yerg. 59; Townsend v. Townsend, 4 Cold. 70; Mankin v. The State, 2 Swan, 206.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Thompson 63, 1 Shan. Cas. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cate-v-little-tenn-1850.