Catchings v. Sachs
This text of 251 A.D. 716 (Catchings v. Sachs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and O’Malley, J., dissent and vote to modify by providing for a computation of the balance due the plaintiff Waddill Catchings on the basis that he is not liable beyond the amount of his capital investment in the firm (Stewart v. Robinson, 115 N. Y. 328), and that in determining the value of the partnership assets the fair value of the Goldman, Sachs Trading Corporation stock as of December 31, 1930, should be taken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 716, 296 N.Y.S. 1022, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catchings-v-sachs-nyappdiv-1937.