Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co.

144 So. 877, 107 Fla. 211
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 10, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 144 So. 877 (Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co., 144 So. 877, 107 Fla. 211 (Fla. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. Upon a directed verdict, judgment was rendered for the defendant. Writ Of error was taken The evidence upon the issues made is such that the cause should have been submitted to the jury upon appropriate instructions by the court. Haile v. Mason Hotel & I. Co., 71 Fla. 469, 71 So. 540; Wood Lumber Co. v. Gibson, 63 Fla. 316, 58 So. 364; King v. Cooney-Eckstein Co., 66 Fla. 246, 63 So. 659. See also cases cited in 2 Compiled General Laws of Florida, 1927, page 1679.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P.J. and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Buford, O.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geo. E. Wood Lumber Co. v. Gipson ex rel. Gilmore
63 Fla. 316 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1912)
King v. Cooney-Eckstein Co.
63 So. 659 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)
Haile v. Mason Hotel & Investment Co.
71 So. 540 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 So. 877, 107 Fla. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catchings-v-florida-mccracken-concrete-pipe-co-fla-1932.