Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co.

144 So. 877, 107 Fla. 211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 Fla. 792
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 10, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. Upon a directed verdict, judgment was rendered for the defendant. Writ Of error was taken The evidence upon the issues made is such that the cause should have been submitted to the jury upon appropriate instructions by the court. Haile v. Mason Hotel & I. Co., 71 Fla. 469, 71 So. 540; Wood Lumber Co. v. Gibson, 63 Fla. 316, 58 So. 364; King v. Cooney-Eckstein Co., 66 Fla. 246, 63 So. 659. See also cases cited in 2 Compiled General Laws of Florida, 1927, page 1679.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P.J. and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Buford, O.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co., 144 So. 877, 107 Fla. 211 (Fla. 1932).

144 So. 877 (Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geo. E. Wood Lumber Co. v. Gipson ex rel. Gilmore
63 Fla. 316 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1912)
King v. Cooney-Eckstein Co.
63 So. 659 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)
Haile v. Mason Hotel & Investment Co.
71 So. 540 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)