Catarino Briseno Jr. v. State
This text of Catarino Briseno Jr. v. State (Catarino Briseno Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00217-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
CATARINO BRISENO JR, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes
Counsel for appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellant signed both
the motion and an affidavit. We find the motion and affidavit together meet the
requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney
must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the motion to dismiss and DISMISS the
appeal.
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will
be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
GREGORY T. PERKES Justice
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 17th day of September, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Catarino Briseno Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catarino-briseno-jr-v-state-texapp-2020.