Catapano v. Francis

31 A.D.2d 650, 296 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2587

This text of 31 A.D.2d 650 (Catapano v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catapano v. Francis, 31 A.D.2d 650, 296 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 20, 1965, reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The [651]*651findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion it was error to receive in evidence, over appellants’ objection, the self-serving written statement of defendant Francis, which was made 24 days after the accident. We consider this error sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 650, 296 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catapano-v-francis-nyappdiv-1968.