Catapano v. De Valll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Catapano v. De Valll

258 A.D. 1067, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8921

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 9, 1940·Published

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Suffolk County, denying defendant’s motion to vacate Ms default and to permit him to appear and answer, reversed on the facts, without costs, and motion granted, upon condition that defendant, witMn ten days from the entry of the order hereon, pay twenty dollars costs to plaintiff’s attorney; defendant’s answer to be served within ten days after payment of costs as herein provided. Otherwise, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., coneur-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Suffolk County, denying defendant’s motion to vacate Ms default and to permit him to appear and answer, reversed on the facts, without costs, and motion granted, upon condition that defendant, witMn ten days from the entry of the order hereon, pay twenty dollars costs to plaintiff’s attorney; defendant’s answer to be served within ten days after payment of costs as herein provided. Otherwise, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., coneur-

Catapano v. De Valll, 258 A.D. 1067, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

258 A.D. 1067 (Catapano v. De Valll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.