Catanzarite Co. v. Roof

456 N.E.2d 1339, 8 Ohio App. 3d 282, 8 Ohio B. 376, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 10957
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 9, 1983
Docket10860
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 456 N.E.2d 1339 (Catanzarite Co. v. Roof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catanzarite Co. v. Roof, 456 N.E.2d 1339, 8 Ohio App. 3d 282, 8 Ohio B. 376, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 10957 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

George, J.

This appeal concerns the vacation of a judgment granted “in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.” The judgment was granted at a motion hearing, when the defendant failed to appear, and pursuant to Civ. R. 37(B)(2)(c), as a sanction for a failure to comply with the court’s order of discovery. The judgment additionally provided for a hearing to determine the issue of damages. Upon the defendant’s subsequent motion, the court vacated the judgment and imposed a lesser sanction.

It is from this state of the record that the plaintiff brings this appeal using the rationale of GTE Automatic Electric v. ARC Industries (1976), 47 Ohio St. 2d 146 [1 O.O.3d 86]. In that case, the court held that an order setting aside a default judgment is a final appealable order.

A default judgment within the reasoning of GTE Automatic Electric v. ARC Industries, supra, contemplates the resolution of all justiciable issues. The entry filed in this case clearly establishes that the issue of damages remains for adjudication. While claims of liability and damages may be separated for trial, there is no provision to bifurcate such issues on appeal.

The default judgment in question here is only a partial judgment. Being so, it fails to meet the requirements of a final appealable order. R.C. 2505.02.

There being no final appealable order of the trial court, the plaintiff’s assignments of error are overruled and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Quillin and Baird, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gasper v. Bank of Am., N.A.
2019 Ohio 1150 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
Gochenour v. Norcia, Unpublished Decision (9-23-2005)
2005 Ohio 5026 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Hsing v. Shu, Unpublished Decision (6-17-2005)
2005 Ohio 3047 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Rizzen v. Spaman
665 N.E.2d 283 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 N.E.2d 1339, 8 Ohio App. 3d 282, 8 Ohio B. 376, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 10957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catanzarite-co-v-roof-ohioctapp-1983.