Catanzano v. Warren Rosen & Co.

19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6802
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 21, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 250 (Catanzano v. Warren Rosen & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catanzano v. Warren Rosen & Co., 19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered May 20, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ motion insofar as to dismiss plaintiff’s negligent misrepresentation and Insurance Law § 2123 claims as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as the representations that allegedly induced plaintiffs purchase of the purportedly nonconforming insurance coverage were made no later than 1990 and this action was not commenced until 2002, plaintiffs negligent misrepresentation and Insurance Law § 2123 claims were time-barred (see CPLR 213 [1]; Fandy Corp. v Lung-Fong Chen, 262 AD2d 352 [1999]; and see CPLR 214 [2]; Goldberg v Manufacturers Life Ins. Co., 242 AD2d 175, 180 [1998], lv dismissed in part and, denied in part 92 NY2d 1000 [1998]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Ellerin and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catanzano-v-warren-rosen-co-nyappdiv-2005.