Catania v. Hacker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Catania v. Hacker

12 A.D.2d 500, 206 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7107

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 500 (Catania v. Hacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Catania v. Hacker, 12 A.D.2d 500, 206 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

.In an action for alleged breach of a lease (1st cause of action) and for conversion of the proceeds of an alleged assignment of such lease (2d cause of action), the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 15, 1960, which denies their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for an affirmative judgment in favor of the corporate defendant on the three counterclaims asserted by it in its answer. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, Special Term properly held that there were substantial issues of fact which could not be determined upon conflicting affidavits. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

.In an action for alleged breach of a lease (1st cause of action) and for conversion of the proceeds of an alleged assignment of such lease (2d cause of action), the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 15, 1960, which denies their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for an affirmative judgment in favor of the corporate defendant on the three counterclaims asserted by it in its answer. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, Special Term properly held that there were substantial issues of fact which could not be determined upon conflicting affidavits. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 500, 206 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catania-v-hacker-nyappdiv-1960.