Catanese v. Thomson

216 F.2d 955
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 1954
DocketNos. 12016-12018
StatusPublished

This text of 216 F.2d 955 (Catanese v. Thomson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catanese v. Thomson, 216 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open [956]*956court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgments of the district court be and are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F.2d 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catanese-v-thomson-ca6-1954.