Catanese v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Catanese v. Allen

27 A.D.3d 1052, 810 N.Y.S.2d 719

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 2006·No. Appeal No. 3·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered December 30, 2004 in a medical malpractice action. The judgment dismissed the complaint against defendant Women’s Christian Association Healthcare System upon its motion for a directed verdict at the close of proof at trial.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Catanese v Furman (27 AD3d 1050 [2006]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered December 30, 2004 in a medical malpractice action. The judgment dismissed the complaint against defendant Women’s Christian Association Healthcare System upon its motion for a directed verdict at the close of proof at trial.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Catanese v Furman (27 AD3d 1050 [2006]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Catanese v. Allen, 27 A.D.3d 1052, 810 N.Y.S.2d 719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

27 A.D.3d 1052 (Catanese v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related