Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Catanese v. Allen

Catanese v. Allen

27 A.D.3d 1052, 810 N.Y.S.2d 719
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 2006
DocketAppeal No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.3d 1052 (Catanese v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catanese v. Allen, 27 A.D.3d 1052, 810 N.Y.S.2d 719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered December 30, 2004 in a medical malpractice action. The judgment dismissed the complaint against defendant Women’s Christian Association Healthcare System upon its motion for a directed verdict at the close of proof at trial.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Catanese v Furman (27 AD3d 1050 [2006]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catanese v. Furman
27 A.D.3d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.3d 1052, 810 N.Y.S.2d 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catanese-v-allen-nyappdiv-2006.