Catalfamo v. Flushing National Bank
This text of 124 A.D.2d 624 (Catalfamo v. Flushing National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[625]*625It appears from the brief submitted by the plaintiffs counsel that the plaintiff died on November 13, 1984. It further appears that no substitution has taken place as required by CPLR 1015. Under these circumstances, the order appealed from is a nullity and this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine the instant appeal (see, Muth v Benjamin, 109 AD2d 736).
We note however, that were the appeal properly before us, we would affirm for reasons stated by Trial Term. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.2d 624, 507 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catalfamo-v-flushing-national-bank-nyappdiv-1986.