Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Cataldo v. Tesciuba

Cataldo v. Tesciuba

128 A.D.2d 824, 513 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44517
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 30, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 824 (Cataldo v. Tesciuba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cataldo v. Tesciuba, 128 A.D.2d 824, 513 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for abuse of process arising from a prior action against the plaintiff to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Joy, J.), dated March 4, 1986, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

[825]*825Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Special Term properly dismissed the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a cause of action (see, Curiano v Suozzi, 63 NY2d 113). Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curiano v. Suozzi
469 N.E.2d 1324 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 A.D.2d 824, 513 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cataldo-v-tesciuba-nyappdiv-1987.