Cataldo v. Long Island Rail Road
This text of 268 A.D. 1054 (Cataldo v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for the examination before trial of the defendant by its employee Case reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The examination should have been granted since Case was at the time of the accident and still is an employee of the defendant and one whose testimony is material and necessary. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 289.) Further, special circumstances existed warranting the examination as the witness was presumably hostile. (Favole v. Gallo, 261 App. Div. 974, Zirn v. Bradley, 257 App. Div. 832.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 1054, 52 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cataldo-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1945.