Cataldo v. Long Island Rail Road

268 A.D. 1054, 52 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5468
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1945·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for the examination before trial of the defendant by its employee Case reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The examination should have been granted since Case was at the time of the accident and still is an employee of the defendant and one whose testimony is material and necessary. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 289.) Further, special circumstances existed warranting the examination as the witness was presumably hostile. (Favole v. Gallo, 261 App. Div. 974, Zirn v. Bradley, 257 App. Div. 832.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cataldo v. Long Island Rail Road, 268 A.D. 1054, 52 N.Y.S.2d 404, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

268 A.D. 1054 (Cataldo v. Long Island Rail Road) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flanigen v. Mullen & Gunn, Inc.
45 Misc. 2d 944 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Hackbarth v. Schoeck
45 Misc. 2d 120 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.
192 Misc. 19 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Kraushaar v. Gross
270 A.D. 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)