Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Cataldo v. Lincoln

Cataldo v. Lincoln

192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 635 (Cataldo v. Lincoln) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cataldo v. Lincoln, 192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered March 1, 1991, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to raise any triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Licari v Elliot, 57 NY2d 230; Tipping-Cestari v Kilkenny, 174 AD2d 663). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Licari v. Elliott
441 N.E.2d 1088 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Tipping-Cestari v. Kilhenny
174 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cataldo-v-lincoln-nyappdiv-1993.