Cataldo v. Lincoln

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cataldo v. Lincoln

192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1993·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered March 1, 1991, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to raise any triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Licari v Elliot, 57 NY2d 230; Tipping-Cestari v Kilkenny, 174 AD2d 663). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered March 1, 1991, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to raise any triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Licari v Elliot, 57 NY2d 230; Tipping-Cestari v Kilkenny, 174 AD2d 663). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cataldo v. Lincoln, 192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

192 A.D.2d 635 (Cataldo v. Lincoln) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related