Cataldo v. Buglass

New York Court of Appeals

Cataldo v. Buglass

351 N.E.2d 428, 39 N.Y.2d 807, 385 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2752

DecidedMay 4, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 351 N.E.2d 428 (Cataldo v. Buglass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cataldo v. Buglass, 351 N.E.2d 428, 39 N.Y.2d 807, 385 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2752 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to respondent Johnson & Higgins, Inc., upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from involves [808]*808a question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals.

Cross application granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from involves a question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to respondent Johnson & Higgins, Inc., upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from involves [808]*808a question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals.

Cross application granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from involves a question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 N.E.2d 428, 39 N.Y.2d 807, 385 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cataldo-v-buglass-ny-1976.