Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc.

625 F.2d 331, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14982

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 11, 1980·No. 77-2221·Published

Opinion

CATALANO, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TARGET SALES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 77-2221, 77-2222.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 27, 1980.
Decided Aug. 11, 1980.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

Jack B. Owens, Orrick, Herrington, Rowley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants; Richard J. Lucas, San Francisco, Cal., James P. Samarco, Fresno, Cal., on brief.

G. Richard Doty, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendants-appellees; J. Wallace Upton, Fresno, Cal., Pamela A. Rymer, Los Angeles, Cal., Ted R. Frame, Coalinga, Cal., on brief.

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD*, District Judge.

We further this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc., et al., --- U.S. ---, 100 S.Ct. 1925, 64 L.Ed.2d 580 (1980).

*

Honorable M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

625 F.2d 331

CATALANO, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TARGET SALES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 77-2221, 77-2222.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 27, 1980.
Decided Aug. 11, 1980.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

Jack B. Owens, Orrick, Herrington, Rowley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants; Richard J. Lucas, San Francisco, Cal., James P. Samarco, Fresno, Cal., on brief.

G. Richard Doty, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendants-appellees; J. Wallace Upton, Fresno, Cal., Pamela A. Rymer, Los Angeles, Cal., Ted R. Frame, Coalinga, Cal., on brief.

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD*, District Judge.

We further this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc., et al., --- U.S. ---, 100 S.Ct. 1925, 64 L.Ed.2d 580 (1980).

*

Honorable M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation

Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc., 625 F.2d 331, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14982 (9th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

625 F.2d 331 (Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related