Catalan v. Catalan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Catalan v. Catalan

60 A.D.3d 1051, 875 N.Y.S.2d 812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.3d 1051 (Catalan v. Catalan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Catalan v. Catalan, 60 A.D.3d 1051, 875 N.Y.S.2d 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Carlos Catalan appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Graham, J.), dated March 19, 2008, which, after a hearing and upon, in effect, a finding that he committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree, directed him to comply with the conditions set forth in an order of protection of the same court also dated March 19, 2008, inter alia, directing him to stay away from his mother for a period of two years.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The fair preponderance of the evidence supports the Family Court’s determination that the appellant committed acts constituting harassment in the second degree in violation of [1052]*1052Penal Law § 240.26 (3), warranting the issuance of the order of protection, inter alia, directing him to stay away from his mother for a period of two years (see Matter of Tabernuro v Jones, 23 AD3d 667 [2005]). Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Carlos Catalan appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Graham, J.), dated March 19, 2008, which, after a hearing and upon, in effect, a finding that he committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree, directed him to comply with the conditions set forth in an order of protection of the same court also dated March 19, 2008, inter alia, directing him to stay away from his mother for a period of two years.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The fair preponderance of the evidence supports the Family Court’s determination that the appellant committed acts constituting harassment in the second degree in violation of [1052]*1052Penal Law § 240.26 (3), warranting the issuance of the order of protection, inter alia, directing him to stay away from his mother for a period of two years (see Matter of Tabernuro v Jones, 23 AD3d 667 [2005]). Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 1051, 875 N.Y.S.2d 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catalan-v-catalan-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack