Cat & Fiddle, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority
This text of 24 A.D.2d 753 (Cat & Fiddle, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Determination of the New York State Liquor [754]*754Authority suspending petitioner’s liquor license, unanimously annulled, on the law, with $30 costs and disbursements to petitioner, and the petition granted. Petitioner was found guilty of violating subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (suffering or permitting licensed premises to become disorderly). The evidence is that on a single occasion a female solicited a police officer for immoral purposes during a conversation conducted in a low tone. It does not appear that anyone connected with the licensee had knowledge of the occurrence. To sustain the violation proof is necessary that the licensee knew or should have known the premises were disorderly in that respect. (Matter of Migliaccio v. O’Connell, 307 N. Y. 566; Matter of Mur-Art-Sol v. State Liq. Auth. of State of New York, 6 A D 2d 683; Matter of Stanwood United v. O’Connell, 283 App. Div. 79.) Concur—■ Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.2d 753, 263 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cat-fiddle-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1965.