Cat-El v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided December 9, 2024·No. Civil Action No. 2024-2852·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PRINCESS CAT-EL,

Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-02852 (JMC)

v.

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS d/b/a LABCORP,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 21, 2024, the Court gave Plaintiff Princess Cat-El, appearing pro se, until

November 21, 2024, to respond to Defendant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings d/b/a

LABCORP’s motion to dismiss or risk dismissal of her case. See ECF 6. To date, however, Cat-

El has neither complied with the Court’s October 21 order nor requested additional time to comply.

Indeed, the Court has had no word from Cat-El since her case was removed to this Court on

October 7, 2024. See ECF 1. District courts “have inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for

a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with a court order.” Angellino v. Royal Family

Al-Saud, 688 F.3d 771, 775 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (quoting Peterson v. Archstone Cmties. LLC, 637

F.3d 416, 418 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citing LCvR 83.23)). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case

is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

__________________________ JIA M. COBB United States District Judge

Date: December 9, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cat-El v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, (D.D.C. 2024).

Cat-El v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Cat-El v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. Archstone Communities LLC
637 F.3d 416 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Angellino v. Royal Family Al-Saud
688 F.3d 771 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)