Caswell v. Caswell

64 Vt. 557
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided May 15, 1892·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TAFT, J.

To entitle one to relief in a divorce court, the party must come with clean hands. It is a general doctrine that a man shall not complain of what he knew, or, might have known at the time of the marriage. At the time of the marriage the libellant knew, or had good reason to believe, that the libel-lee would be sentenced to life imprisonment in the State prison under a prior conviction of murder. When one marries a State prison convict it is trifling with the law, for the party to say, she did not know that sentence would follow conviction. A slight delay would have given the knowledge.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caswell v. Caswell, 64 Vt. 557 (Vt. 1892).

64 Vt. 557 (Caswell v. Caswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clough v. Clough
84 N.W.2d 16 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1957)
Williamson v. Williamson
204 S.W.2d 785 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1947)