Caswell v. Caswell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Caswell v. Caswell

177 S.E. 247, 179 Ga. 676, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 370

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1934

DocketNo. 10176

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 177 S.E. 247 (Caswell v. Caswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caswell v. Caswell, 177 S.E. 247, 179 Ga. 676, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 370 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Hutcheson, J.

1. The discretion of the trial judge in allowing temporary alimony, unless it has been flagrantly abused, will not be controlled by this court. Ethridge v. Ethridge, 149 Ga. 44 (99 S. E. 37).

2. The evidence was conflicting, and it can not be said that there was such an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge as to require a reversal of the judgment allowing temporary alimony. Kelly v. Kelly, 146 Ga. 362 (91 S. E. 120).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error'. L. M. Wyatt, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI