Caswell v. Allen

10 Johns. 118
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1813·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff had no right to discharge the judgment or compound with the defendant, without leave of the court. (Sess. 11. c. 9. s. 7. 1 Bos. & Pull. 18. Stra. 167.) But the plaintiff had a right to receive payment of the judgment, and discharge it; the statute providing (sess. 30. c. 43.) that any person might prosecute the action for the penalty, and that one moiety should belong to him, and the other moiety, when recovered, should be paid into the treasury of the state. The plaintiff was trustee for a moiety of the judgment, and a payment to him would discharge the defendant.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caswell v. Allen, 10 Johns. 118 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

10 Johns. 118 (Caswell v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marvin v. Trout
199 U.S. 212 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Megargell v. Hazleton Coal Co.
8 Watts & Serg. 342 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1845)
Burley v. Burley
6 N.H. 200 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)