Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.

206 Ill. App. 626

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 11, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,847

StatusPublished

This text of 206 Ill. App. 626 (Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co., 206 Ill. App. 626 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSukely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*—when evidence is sufficient to warrant judgment on set-off in action on contract. In an action on an account for teaming and hauling where defendant interposed a set-off to recover an overpayment, consisting of a balance due after allowance being made for extras out of a sum paid to plaintiff for services and extras, evidence held insufficient to sustain a judgment for plaintiff and to warrant a judgment for defendant on. his set-off.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSukely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*—when evidence is sufficient to warrant judgment on set-off in action on contract. In an action on an account for teaming and hauling where defendant interposed a set-off to recover an overpayment, consisting of a balance due after allowance being made for extras out of a sum paid to plaintiff for services and extras, evidence held insufficient to sustain a judgment for plaintiff and to warrant a judgment for defendant on. his set-off.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 Ill. App. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casty-v-lanzit-corrugated-box-co-illappct-1917.