Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.

206 Ill. App. 626

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 11, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,847·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSukely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*—when evidence is sufficient to warrant judgment on set-off in action on contract. In an action on an account for teaming and hauling where defendant interposed a set-off to recover an overpayment, consisting of a balance due after allowance being made for extras out of a sum paid to plaintiff for services and extras, evidence held insufficient to sustain a judgment for plaintiff and to warrant a judgment for defendant on. his set-off.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSukely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*—when evidence is sufficient to warrant judgment on set-off in action on contract. In an action on an account for teaming and hauling where defendant interposed a set-off to recover an overpayment, consisting of a balance due after allowance being made for extras out of a sum paid to plaintiff for services and extras, evidence held insufficient to sustain a judgment for plaintiff and to warrant a judgment for defendant on. his set-off.

Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co., 206 Ill. App. 626 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

206 Ill. App. 626 (Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.