Castronuovo v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 235 A.D. 633 (Castronuovo v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the following grounds: (1) The plaintiff is not a proper party plaintiff; (2) plaintiff did not prove that proofs of death were submitted to defendant; (3) the proofs of death were admissible in evidence. I do not agree with the holding of this court in Smith v. Prudential Insurance Co. (147 App. Div. 580), but follow the holding in Vecchio v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (224 id. 301) and Cirrincioni v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (223 id. 461).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castronuovo-v-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1932.