Castro v. Sze
39 A.D.2d 689, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4567
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 18, 1972
StatusPublished
This text of 39 A.D.2d 689 (Castro v. Sze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Castro v. Sze, 39 A.D.2d 689, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal denied without prejudice to renewal on compliance with rule 600.11(d) of this court (22 NYCRR 600.11[d]). In addition, counsel’s attention is called to Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Prac. (vol. 7, par. 5501.13). Concur—Stevens, P. J., McGivem, Steuer, Tilzer and Eager, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.2d 689, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castro-v-sze-nyappdiv-1972.