Castro v. State

84 So. 3d 1198, 2012 WL 1108439, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5108
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Castro v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 So. 3d 616
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 2012·No. 3D12-551·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying in part his motion seeking credit for time served prior to his sentencing. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). Although the trial court’s form order indicates that it both grants in part and denies in part the motion, the portion of the order denying the motion simply says “Denied. As to all prior credit time served (CTS).” There are no attachments to the order nor any record provided which conclusively establish that the defendant is entitled to no relief.

We therefore reverse that portion of the order which summarily denies the defendant’s motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (“On appeal from the [summary] denial of relief, unless the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief, the order shall be reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief.”). Should the trial court, upon remand, determine that the motion should be denied without an evidentiary hearing, the court shall attach those portions of the record which shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castro v. State, 84 So. 3d 1198, 2012 WL 1108439, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

84 So. 3d 1198 (Castro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.